Nuclear weapon yield Totally Explained

Everything about Nuclear Weapon Yield totally explained

The explosive yield of a nuclear weapon is the amount of energy, called the yield, discharged when a nuclear weapon is detonated, expressed usually in the equivalent mass of trinitrotoluene (TNT), either in kilotons (thousands of tons of TNT) or megatons (millions of tons of TNT), but sometimes also in terajoules (1 kiloton of TNT = 4.184 TJ). Because the precise amount of energy released by TNT is and was subject to measurement uncertainties, especially at the dawn of the nuclear age, the accepted convention is that one kt of TNT is simply defined to be 10¹² calories equivalent, this being very roughly equal to the energy yield of 1,000 tons of TNT.

Examples of nuclear weapon yields

In order of increasing yield (most yield figures are approximate):

Bomb	Yield		Notes
Bomb	kt TNT	TJ	Notes
Davy Crockett		variable yield tactical nuclear weapon—mass only 23 kg (51 lb), lightest ever deployed by the United States (same warhead as Special Atomic Demolition Munition and GAR-11 Nuclear Falcon missile)
Hiroshima's		gun type uranium-235 fission bomb (the first of the two nuclear weapons that have been used in warfare)
Nagasaki's gravity bomb		implosion type Plutonium-239 fission bomb (the second of the two nuclear weapons used in warfare)
W76 warhead		Twelve of these may be in a MIRVed Trident II missile; treaty limited to eight
B61 nuclear bomb	various		Mod 7—up to Mod 10—four yield options Mod 11—undisclosed yield
W87 warhead		Ten of these were in a MIRVed LG-118A Peacekeeper.
W88 warhead		Twelve of these may be in a Trident II missile (treaty limited to eight)
Ivy King device		second most powerful pure fission bomb, 60 kg uranium, implosion type
Orange Herald		most powerful pure fission bomb, UK
B83 nuclear bomb	variable		up to ; most powerful US weapon in active service
B53 nuclear bomb		most powerful US warhead; no longer in active service, but 50 are retained as part of the "Hedge" portion of the Enduring Stockpile; similar to the W-53 warhead that has been used in the Titan II Missile; decommissioned in 1987
Castle Bravo device		most powerful US test
EC17/Mk-17, the EC24/Mk-24, and the B41 (Mk-41)	various		most powerful US weapons ever: ; the Mk-17 was also the largest by size and mass: about ; the Mk-41 had a mass of 4800 kg; gravity bombs carried by B-36 bomber (retired by 1957)
The entire Operation Castle nuclear test series		the highest-yielding test series conducted by the US
Tsar Bomba device		USSR, most powerful explosive device ever, mass of 27 short tons (24,000 kg), in its "full" form (for example with a depleted uranium tamper instead of one made of lead) it would have been .
All nuclear testing		total energy expended during all nuclear testing.(External Link)

As a comparison, the blast yield of the GBU-43 Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb (perhaps the most powerful non-nuclear weapon ever designed) is 0.011 kt, and that of the Oklahoma City bombing, using a truck-based fertilizer bomb, was 0.002 kt. Most artificial non-nuclear explosions are considerably smaller than even what are considered to be very small nuclear weapons.

Yield limits

The yield-to-weight ratio is the amount of weapon yield compared to the mass of the weapon. The theoretical maximum yield-to-weight ratio for fusion weapons is 6 megatons of TNT per metric ton (25 TJ/kg). The practical achievable limit is somewhat lower. The United States claimed they'd the capability of tipping a Titan II ICBM with a fusion bomb. If this were the case, the yield to weight ratio would be about . For current US weapons 600 to 2,200 megatons of TNT per metric ton (2.5–9.2 TJ/kg). By comparison, for the Davy Crockett it was 0.4 to 40 kilotons of TNT per metric ton (0.002–0.167 TJ/kg), for Little Boy, for the Tsar Bomba ) (deliberately reduced from the possible maximum which was twice as much), and for the Mk-41, .
The largest pure-fission bomb ever constructed had a yield, which is probably in the range of the upper limit on such designs. Fusion boosting could likely raise the efficiency of such a weapon significantly, but eventually all fission-based weapons have an upper yield due to the difficulties of dealing with large critical masses. However there's no known upper yield limit for a fusion (e.g, hydrogen) bomb. In principle a fusion bomb could be many thousand megatons. Because of the maximum theoretical yield-to-weight ratio is about, and the maximum achievable ratio about, there's a practical limit on air delivery of the weapon.
For example, if the full payload of 250 metric tons of the Antonov An-225 could be used, the limit would be 250 t × 5.2 Mt/t, or . Likewise the maximum limit of a missile-delivered weapon is determined by the missile payload capacity. The large Russian SS-18 ICBM has a payload capacity of 7,200 kg, so the calculated maximum delivered yield would be . In fact the SS-18 mod 1 yield for a single warhead is about . In more recent practice, large single warheads are seldom used, since smaller MIRV warheads are more destructive for a given total yield or payload capacity.

Calculating yields and controversy

Yields of nuclear explosions can be very hard to calculate, even using numbers as rough as in the kiloton or megaton range (much less down to the resolution of individual terajoules). Even under very controlled conditions, precise yields can be very hard to determine, and for less controlled conditions the margins of error can be quite large. Yields can be calculated in a number of ways, including calculations based on blast size, blast brightness, seismographic data, and the strength of the shock wave. Enrico Fermi famously made a (very) rough calculation of the yield of the Trinity test by dropping small pieces of paper in the air and measuring at how far they were moved by the shock wave of the explosion.
A good approximation of the yield of the Trinity test device was obtained from simple dimensional analysis by the British physicist G. I. Taylor. Taylor noted that the radius R of the blast should initially depend only on the energy E of the explosion, the time t after the detonation, and the density ρ of the air. The only number having dimensions of length that can be constructed from these quantities is:

R=(

Using the picture of the Trinity test shown here (which had been publicly released by the U.S. government and published in Life magazine), Taylor estimated that at t = 0.025 s the blast radius was 140 metres. Taking ρ to be 1 kg/m³ and solving for E, he obtained that the yield was about 22 kilotons of TNT (90 TJ). This very simple argument agrees within 10% with the official value of the bomb's yield,, which at the time that Taylor published his result was considered highly-classified information. (See G. I. Taylor, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A201, pp. 159, 175 (1950).)
Where this data isn't available, as in a number of cases, precise yields have been in dispute, especially when they're tied to questions of politics. The weapons used in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, for example, were highly individual and very idiosyncratic designs, and gauging their yield retrospectively has been quite difficult. The Hiroshima bomb, "Little Boy", is estimated to have been between (a 20% margin of error), while the Nagasaki bomb, "Fat Man", is estimated to be between (a 10% margin of error). Such apparently small changes in values can be important when trying to use the data from these bombings as reflective of how other bombs would behave in combat, and also result in differing assessments of how many "Hiroshima bombs" other weapons are equivalent to (for example, the Ivy Mike hydrogen bomb was equivalent to either 867 or 578 Hiroshima weapons — a rhetorically quite substantial difference — depending on whether one uses the high or low figure for the calculation). Other disputed yields have included the massive Tsar Bomba, whose yield was claimed between being "only" or at a maximum of by differing political figures, either as a way for hyping the power of the bomb or as an attempt to undercut it.
Nuclear testing yields, as in the Tsar Bomba example, can also be used as a way of reflecting upon technical expertise, and claiming higher yields or accusations of lower yields can be used as a way of promoting or disparaging the technical abilities of a nuclear program. When India claimed to have successfully detonated a hydrogen bomb in their 1998 Operation Shakti tests, many Western observers relied on analysis of seismographic data to determine whether the Indian tests reflected a successful hydrogen bomb detonation. Some have alleged that India's reported yields have been higher than their actual test yields, a move which would apparently be for political purposes (to claim more nuclear ability than their rival Pakistan, for example, or to demonstrate their military might to other potential rivals such as nearby China) if true.

Further Information

Get more info on 'Nuclear Weapon Yield'.

External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

<a href="http://nuclear_weapon_yield.totallyexplained.com">Nuclear weapon yield Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.